Communication via email has become a ubiquitous means of conveying information in the practice of law. Also common are email chains where multiple people are recipients, and the ability to reach a great many people with the simple click of a button, the one that says “reply all.” Beyond the obvious warning to attorneys to…
Continue reading…
You Can’t Do That Counselor!
Attorney Markis Miguel Abraham of Jersey City represented an elderly client in connection with certain real estate transactions and the sale of multiple properties, including a bar. He also represented her in the defense of two lawsuits which stemmed from the ownership of the bar. Abraham became friendly with his elderly client, and told…
Continue reading…WHERE WILL YOUR LEGAL MALPRACTICE CASE BE LITIGATED?
Arbitration of claims has gained traction over the years as a faster and relatively inexpensive alternative to trial court proceedings. However, it is not always advantageous to forego the right to a judge and a jury. An individual who holds a claim or potential claim should give careful thought to where that claim may ultimately…
Continue reading…DOES YOUR LAWYER WEAR TOO MANY HATS?
While the notion of lawyers wearing wigs to court has no place in modern American jurisprudence, there is always a danger of a lawyer wearing too many hats. A lawyer, however experienced and competent, may find themselves in legal trouble for assuming too many roles as advocate and counselor, resulting in financial detriment to their…
Continue reading…
Hack Exposing Patients’ Data
A fertility clinic in New Jersey has agreed to pay the state approximately half a million dollars to settle an investigation regarding its role in a data breach that compromised the personal information of nearly 15,000 patients. The hack allowed unauthorized access to the protected health information of patients of the Diamond Institute for Infertility…
Continue reading…
Despite Shields, Businesses Must be Prepared to Defend Against COVID-19 Lawsuits
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, many states have enacted business liability shields to protect businesses from pandemic-related liability. However, as much of this legislation provides immunity from liability—not from litigation—businesses must remain prepared to defend COVID-19 lawsuits. In this article, we examine COVID-19 business liability shields and their effect on businesses facing pandemic-related…
Continue reading…
NJ Attorney Faces Suit Over Pressuring Client to Accept Unfavorable Settlement
A New Jersey court recently refused to dismiss a case involving an attorney who allegedly pressured his client to accept an unfavorable medical malpractice settlement at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Approximately one year after the $600,000 settlement was put on the record in the underlying case, Judge Lisa M. Adubato denied attorney Anthony…
Continue reading…
New Jersey General Assembly Votes to Eliminate Mandatory Sentences for Nonviolent Offenders
New Jersey’s General Assembly recently approved a measure to eliminate mandatory minimum sentences for certain nonviolent offenders. It is unclear, however, whether New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy will sign it. Although Murphy has long advocated for the elimination of mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent property and drug crimes, he has previously stated that he would…
Continue reading…
United Airlines Must Pay $49 Million to Resolve Fraud Charges
United Airlines recently agreed to pay over $49 million to resolve charges of fraud. According to public records, United entered into International Commercial Air (“ICAIR”) contracts with the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) to transport U.S. mail internationally on behalf of USPS. Pursuant to these contracts, United was required to provide bar code scans of…
Continue reading…
New Jersey Lawyer Receives Reprimand After Accepting Improper Loans
A New Jersey lawyer has received a reprimand from the New Jersey Supreme Court after it was revealed that he accepted $75,000 in improper loans from clients. During its investigation, the court found that the loans were improper because the lawyer, Michael Rehill, failed to advise his clients in writing to seek independent legal advice…
Continue reading…